Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
How G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. stacks up
GIII · against 485 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
93/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #25 of 486 · scores higher than 94% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score43 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including GIII · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 65% of peers. EBITDA yield: 26.7% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 86% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.1% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 90% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 20.4% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GIII, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GIII | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 481 reported | 9.8% | 4.8% | 87% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 497 reported | 11.4% | 9.2% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 146 reported | 20.4% | 6.9% | 90% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 484 reported | 136.6% | 56.0% | 86% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GIII| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 6.9B HKD (≈$885M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 20 | 112.3B JPY (≈$764M) | 94 | 73 | |
| 25 | 133.8B JPY (≈$910M) | 93 | 70 | |
| 25 | 392.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 93 | 77 | |
| 25 | 1.4B USD | 93 | 65 | |
| 25 | 1.3B USD | 93 | 65 | |
| 25 | 17.7B ZAR (≈$972M) | 93 | 61 | |
| 30 | 1.67T KRW (≈$1.2B) | 92 | 48 | |
| 30 | 4.3B MYR (≈$937M) | 92 | 69 | |
| 30 | 4.1B BRL (≈$733M) | 92 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score