Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GIB · against 181 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #72 of 182 · scores higher than 61% of peers · safety percentile 48
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)20 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including GIB · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker current ratio and debt / equity than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GIB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 173 reported | 0.44× | 0.34× | 45% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 173 reported | 0.17 | 1.07 | 97% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 181 reported | 0.94× | 1.63× | 10% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 2 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 9.1B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 4 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 68 | 271.6B TWD (≈$8.4B) | 51 | 45 | |
| 69 | 10.5B USD | 50 | 36 | |
| 70 | 1.74T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 49 | 64 | |
| 71 | 20.0B USD | 48 | 78 | |
| 72 | 16.8B USD | 48 | 66 | |
| 73 | 4.77T JPY (≈$32.5B) | 47 | 62 | |
| 74 | 660.3B TWD (≈$20.5B) | 47 | 65 | |
| 75 | 3.47T JPY (≈$23.6B) | 47 | 47 | |
| 76 | 14.5B USD | 46 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score