Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gerdau S.A.
How Gerdau S.A. stacks up
GGB · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
22/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #159 of 183 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including GGB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 94% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -68.1% vs peer median 9.4%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 70% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -5.4% vs peer median -0.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.2% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GGB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GGB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 4.2% | 9.9% | 34% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | -68.1% | 17.1% | 8% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | -5.4% | 1.5% | 18% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GGB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 155 | 10.1B USD | 24 | 46 | |
| 157 | 1.2B USD | 23 | 47 | |
| 157 | 8.8B USD | 23 | 24 | |
| 159 | 2.6B USD | 22 | 45 | |
| 159 | 9.1B USD | 22 | 64 | |
| 159 | 5.6B USD | 22 | 48 | |
| 162 | 4.5B USD | 21 | 56 | |
| 162 | 46.7B USD | 21 | 53 | |
| 164 | 3.7B USD | 19 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score