Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Greenfire Resources Ltd.
How Greenfire Resources Ltd. stacks up
GFR · against 108 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
1/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #107 of 109 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score15 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including GFR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 1?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth, earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 96% of peers. Revenue growth: -26.1% vs peer median 0.5%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 93% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -78.2% vs peer median 1.1%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 89% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -14.9% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GFR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GFR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 111 reported | -26.1% | 1.3% | 5% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 74 reported | -78.2% | -20.2% | 12% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 107 reported | -14.9% | -0.0% | 13% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GFR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 4 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 98 | |
| 5 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 95 | 38 | |
| 104 | 5.9B ILS (≈$1.6B) | 3 | 44 | |
| 106 | 1.3B USD | 2 | 59 | |
| 107 | 9.2B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 1 | 14 | |
| 107 | 19.7B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 1 | 17 | |
| 107 | 1.5B USD | 1 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score