Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GFL · against 231 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #168 of 232 · scores higher than 28% of peers · safety percentile 25
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)39 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including GFL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GFL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 227 reported | 1.34× | 0.53× | 17% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 224 reported | 0.49 | 0.86 | 78% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 225 reported | 0.75× | 1.45× | 5% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.4B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 1.36T JPY (≈$9.2B) | 96 | 70 | |
| 3 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 95 | 70 | |
| 4 | 1.44T JPY (≈$9.8B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 5 | 28.8B USD | 94 | 73 | |
| 164 | 20.6B USD | 25 | 61 | |
| 165 | 87.3B HKD (≈$11.2B) | 25 | 67 | |
| 166 | 10.2B USD | 25 | 28 | |
| 167 | 85.4B SEK (≈$8.5B) | 25 | 50 | |
| 168 | 16.5B USD | 25 | 57 | |
| 169 | 16.48T KRW (≈$11.9B) | 25 | 61 | |
| 170 | 15.6B USD | 24 | 46 | |
| 171 | 8.7B USD | 24 | 53 | |
| 172 | 8.6B USD | 24 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score