Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gevo, Inc.
How Gevo, Inc. stacks up
GEVO · against 335 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #2 of 336 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including GEVO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 98% of peers. Revenue growth: 121.4% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 100% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 168.7% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GEVO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GEVO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 341 reported | 121.4% | 0.6% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 191 reported | Not reported | -2.8% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 332 reported | 168.7% | -1.8% | 99% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GEVO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 220M GBP (≈$286M) | 99 | 97 | |
| 2 | 3.2B CNY (≈$452M) | 98 | 46 | |
| 2 | 486M AUD (≈$321M) | 98 | 44 | |
| 2 | 294M USD | 98 | 37 | |
| 5 | 301M USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 6 | 143M GBP (≈$186M) | 96 | 95 | |
| 7 | 3.7B CNY (≈$524M) | 95 | 46 | |
| 7 | 741.2B KRW (≈$534M) | 95 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score