Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Getty Images Holdings, Inc.
How Getty Images Holdings, Inc. stacks up
GETY · against 5 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
23/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #3 of 6 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score2 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including GETY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 23?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1232.6% vs peer median 7.4%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -2367.2% vs peer median 2.9%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.5% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GETY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GETY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 7 reported | -2437.5% | -908.6% | 33% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 6 reported | 11.7% | -0.3% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 4 reported | -1251.1% | -65.1% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 7 reported | 6693.7% | 36.7% | 100% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GETY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6M CAD (≈$4M) | 40 | 34 | |
| 2 | 5M CAD (≈$4M) | 29 | 17 | |
| 3 | 7M USD | 23 | 20 | |
| 4 | 33M BRL (≈$6M) | 2 | 3 | |
| 5 | 12M USD | 0 | 6 | |
| 5 | 284M THB (≈$8M) | 0 | 2 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score