Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Genesis Energy, L.P.
How Genesis Energy, L.P. stacks up
GEL · against 196 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #121 of 197 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score18 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including GEL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger operating margin, but weaker return on assets than most Energy peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 74% of peers. Return on assets: 1.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 8.9% vs peer median 9.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 66% of peers. Operating margin: 19.1% vs peer median 11.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GEL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GEL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 190 reported | 8.9% | 9.2% | 48% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 193 reported | 19.1% | 13.4% | 62% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 194 reported | 1.5% | 4.4% | 28% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 190 reported | 22.7% | 11.8% | 75% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 197 reported | 35.1% | 41.2% | 43% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GEL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19.8B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 1.3B USD | 99 | 59 | |
| 2 | 986M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 3.1B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 118 | 443M USD | 41 | 42 | |
| 118 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score