Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GEF · against 299 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #137 of 300 · scores higher than 55% of peers · safety percentile 47
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)21 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including GEF · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GEF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 289 reported | 0.39× | 0.60× | 64% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 290 reported | 0.79 | 0.81 | 52% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 288 reported | 1.29× | 1.48× | 39% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 2 | 404.1B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 97 | 80 | |
| 3 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 4 | 480.8B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 5 | 514.3B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 133 | 2.7B EUR (≈$3.0B) | 49 | 48 | |
| 134 | 2.5B USD | 49 | 62 | |
| 135 | 40.0B CNY (≈$5.6B) | 48 | 70 | |
| 136 | 3.1B USD | 48 | 59 | |
| 137 | 4.6B USD | 47 | 44 | |
| 138 | 3.3B USD | 47 | 73 | |
| 139 | 3.8B USD | 45 | 62 | |
| 140 | 40.8B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 45 | 31 | |
| 141 | 19.6B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 45 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score