Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Greif, Inc.
How Greif, Inc. stacks up
GEF · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
48/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #170 of 356 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including GEF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 4.4%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 10.2% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GEF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GEF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 2.7% | 4.3% | 36% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 10.2% | 8.4% | 66% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | Not reported | 5.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 65.0% | 35.8% | 70% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GEF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 161 | 119.7B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 161 | 3.0B USD | 49 | 60 | |
| 161 | 10.2B USD | 49 | 44 | |
| 161 | 22.8B USD | 49 | 50 | |
| 170 | 4.6B USD | 48 | 44 | |
| 170 | 489M USD | 48 | 54 | |
| 170 | 20.5B USD | 48 | 50 | |
| 170 | 1.5B USD | 48 | 44 | |
| 174 | 4.0B USD | 47 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score