Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to GE Aerospace
How GE Aerospace stacks up
GE · against 8 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
29/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #8 of 9 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score2 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including GE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 74% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.3% vs peer median 6.9%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.5% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 9 reported | 2.6% | 3.7% | 13% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 9 reported | 3.3% | 4.9% | 25% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 9 reported | 2.5% | 3.1% | 25% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 9 reported | 5.3% | 10.8% | 25% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 180.3B USD | 45 | 49 | |
| 2 | 153.0B EUR (≈$168.3B) | 43 | 51 | |
| 2 | 210.5B EUR (≈$231.5B) | 43 | 43 | |
| 4 | 286.8B USD | 40 | 52 | |
| 5 | 274.7B USD | 38 | 55 | |
| 6 | 179.5B USD | 31 | 35 | |
| 7 | 244.5B USD | 30 | 62 | |
| 8 | 332.7B USD | 29 | 56 | |
| 9 | 1.85T BRL (≈$332.4B) | 28 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score