Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to GDS Holdings Limited
How GDS Holdings Limited stacks up
GDS · against 356 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
29/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #281 of 357 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score32 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including GDS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 97% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -76.0% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 10.8% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.2% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GDS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GDS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 359 reported | 10.8% | 10.9% | 49% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 243 reported | -76.0% | 12.5% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 355 reported | 7.2% | 6.6% | 52% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GDS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 3 | 21.5B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 37.9B CNY (≈$5.3B) | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 83 | |
| 274 | 231.6B INR (≈$2.8B) | 32 | 64 | |
| 279 | 35.5B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 31 | 54 | |
| 280 | 7.19T KRW (≈$5.2B) | 30 | 48 | |
| 281 | 155.5B TWD (≈$4.8B) | 29 | 33 | |
| 281 | 4.4B USD | 29 | 45 | |
| 281 | 4.2B CHF (≈$4.9B) | 29 | 49 | |
| 281 | 6.4B USD | 29 | 47 | |
| 285 | 4.7B USD | 28 | 19 | |
| 285 | 4.9B USD | 28 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score