Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Green Dot Corporation
How Green Dot Corporation stacks up
GDOT · against 83 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
26/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #69 of 84 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including GDOT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -3.7% vs peer median 5.7%
- Cash exceeds market value plus debt, so EBITDA yield is not meaningful and is left out.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.9% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GDOT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GDOT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 149 reported | -4.1% | 6.7% | 12% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | Not reported | 8.2% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | 11.7% | 11.7% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 141 reported | 132.4% | 110.7% | 73% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GDOT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 1.1B CAD (≈$782M) | 98 | 59 | |
| 66 | 192.3B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 31 | 23 | |
| 66 | 331M EUR (≈$364M) | 31 | 33 | |
| 68 | 149.8B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 30 | 20 | |
| 69 | 333M EUR (≈$366M) | 26 | 45 | |
| 69 | 709M USD | 26 | 32 | |
| 71 | 1.3B AUD (≈$862M) | 22 | 36 | |
| 72 | 434M USD | 16 | 43 | |
| 73 | 394M USD | 14 | ||
| 74 | 10.8B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 10 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score