Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GCT · against 477 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #410 of 478 · scores higher than 14% of peers · safety percentile 16
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)44 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including GCT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GCT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 467 reported | 0.95× | 0.22× | 17% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 458 reported | 1.64 | 0.85 | 12% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 474 reported | 2.09× | 1.89× | 56% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 406 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.5B) | 17 | 57 | |
| 407 | 2.0B USD | 17 | 22 | |
| 408 | 92.4B TWD (≈$2.9B) | 17 | 52 | |
| 409 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 16 | 37 | |
| 410 | 2.0B USD | 16 | 70 | |
| 411 | 1.9B USD | 16 | 59 | |
| 412 | 11.9B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 16 | 33 | |
| 413 | 15.7B DKK (≈$2.4B) | 15 | 44 | |
| 414 | 47.6B TWD (≈$1.5B) | 15 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score