Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to GCM Grosvenor Inc.
How GCM Grosvenor Inc. stacks up
GCMG · against 119 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #37 of 120 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score7 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including GCMG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 8.8% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.0% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 83% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 55.1% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GCMG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GCMG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 134 reported | 7.0% | 3.9% | 56% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 103 reported | 55.1% | -6.5% | 83% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 101 reported | 8.8% | 8.7% | 51% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GCMG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 1 | 10.8B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 4 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 34 | 1.0B USD | 71 | 48 | |
| 35 | 907M EUR (≈$998M) | 70 | ||
| 36 | 2.0B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 66 | 51 | |
| 37 | 1.0B AUD (≈$687M) | 64 | 69 | |
| 37 | 779M USD | 64 | 60 | |
| 37 | 2.0B AUD (≈$1.3B) | 64 | ||
| 40 | 674M USD | 63 | 53 | |
| 41 | 41.9B INR (≈$502M) | 62 | 67 | |
| 42 | 453M EUR (≈$499M) | 60 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score