Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Galectin Therapeutics Inc.
How Galectin Therapeutics Inc. stacks up
GALT · against 386 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
33/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #200 of 387 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score41 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including GALT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -8.2% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -4.7% vs peer median 0.0%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GALT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GALT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 370 reported | -12.8% | -0.4% | 27% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | Not reported | 1.9% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 192 reported | -4.7% | -9.3% | 63% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 379 reported | -62.6% | 50.1% | 2% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GALT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 200 | 274M USD | 33 | 57 | |
| 200 | 213M USD | 33 | ||
| 200 | 216M USD | 33 | 44 | |
| 200 | 285M USD | 33 | 38 | |
| 200 | 338M USD | 33 | ||
| 200 | 215M USD | 33 | 34 | |
| 200 | 239M USD | 33 | 38 | |
| 200 | 469M USD | 33 | 50 | |
| 200 | 631M USD | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score