Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gladstone Investment Corporatio
How Gladstone Investment Corporatio stacks up
GAIN · against 121 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #5 of 122 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score14 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including GAIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 168.0% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 97% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 75.8% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 97% of peers. Revenue growth: 188.0% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GAIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GAIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 137 reported | 188.0% | 4.0% | 95% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 94 reported | 168.0% | -0.7% | 88% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 103 reported | 75.8% | 6.8% | 97% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GAIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 1 | 10.8B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 48 | |
| 5 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 5 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 7 | 6.7B SEK (≈$667M) | 96 | 74 | |
| 8 | 572M GBP (≈$743M) | 95 | 62 | |
| 9 | 461M USD | 93 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score