Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GAB · against 94 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #28 of 95 · scores higher than 71% of peers · safety percentile 71
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)8 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including GAB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GAB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 84 reported | 0.05× | 0.57× | 82% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 100 reported | 0.76 | 0.65 | 36% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 90 reported | 3.37× | 2.25× | 61% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 907M EUR (≈$998M) | 99 | ||
| 2 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 3 | 231.2B INR (≈$2.8B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 4 | 21.21T IDR (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 93 | |
| 5 | 3.1B AUD (≈$2.1B) | 96 | 62 | |
| 24 | 10.8B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 74 | 48 | |
| 25 | 22.0B SEK (≈$2.2B) | 73 | ||
| 26 | 1.25T CLP (≈$1.4B) | 72 | ||
| 27 | 3.9B AUD (≈$2.6B) | 71 | 47 | |
| 28 | 1.8B USD | 71 | 60 | |
| 29 | 1.5B GBP (≈$1.9B) | 70 | 46 | |
| 30 | 6.5B MYR (≈$1.4B) | 69 | 57 | |
| 31 | 90.1B THB (≈$2.5B) | 66 | 57 | |
| 32 | 155.0B INR (≈$1.9B) | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score