Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Genpact Limited
How Genpact Limited stacks up
G · against 287 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #187 of 288 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score34 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including G · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.5% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.3% vs peer median 11.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.0% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = G, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | G | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 290 reported | 6.5% | 12.2% | 30% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 209 reported | 12.3% | 17.3% | 43% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 285 reported | 6.0% | 8.5% | 42% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around G| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 3 | 37.9B CNY (≈$5.3B) | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 83 | |
| 3 | 3.8B USD | 99 | 74 | |
| 179 | 6.8B USD | 50 | 52 | |
| 184 | 46.1B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 49 | 59 | |
| 184 | 5.7B USD | 49 | 60 | |
| 184 | 6.5B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 187 | 6.7B USD | 48 | 68 | |
| 188 | 910.0B JPY (≈$6.2B) | 47 | 68 | |
| 188 | 6.2B USD | 47 | 53 | |
| 190 | 28.4B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 46 | 59 | |
| 190 | 24.4B CNY (≈$3.4B) | 46 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score