Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.
How First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. stacks up
FWRG · against 621 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
23/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #476 of 622 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score65 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including FWRG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 23?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 77% of peers. Operating margin: 2.1% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 74% of peers. Return on assets: 1.0% vs peer median 3.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on invested capital: 2.5% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FWRG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FWRG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 594 reported | 2.5% | 6.9% | 30% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 620 reported | 2.1% | 6.2% | 21% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 592 reported | 1.0% | 2.9% | 26% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 581 reported | 2.9% | 6.6% | 31% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 623 reported | 20.6% | 29.9% | 33% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FWRG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 4 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 97 | 83 | |
| 476 | 137.4B JPY (≈$935M) | 23 | 41 | |
| 476 | 67.7B JPY (≈$461M) | 23 | 45 | |
| 476 | 4.4B CNY (≈$612M) | 23 | 22 | |
| 476 | 876M USD | 23 | 44 | |
| 476 | 841M USD | 23 | 47 | |
| 476 | 1.2B USD | 23 | 33 | |
| 487 | 3.1B CNY (≈$436M) | 22 | 20 | |
| 487 | 3.9B CNY (≈$540M) | 22 | 27 | |
| 487 | 1.37T KRW (≈$985M) | 22 | 14 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score