Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FVRR · against 115 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #77 of 116 · scores higher than 34% of peers · safety percentile 42
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including FVRR · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FVRR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 106 reported | 0.00× | 0.27× | 94% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 113 reported | 1.55 | 0.56 | 5% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 113 reported | 1.79× | 1.45× | 59% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 56.0B JPY (≈$381M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1.4B HKD (≈$182M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 4 | 1.2B BRL (≈$211M) | 98 | 89 | |
| 5 | 2.5B HKD (≈$316M) | 97 | 70 | |
| 73 | 285M GBP (≈$370M) | 45 | 30 | |
| 74 | 2.4B DKK (≈$363M) | 44 | 60 | |
| 75 | 439.6B CLP (≈$484M) | 44 | 68 | |
| 76 | 393M USD | 43 | 78 | |
| 77 | 297M USD | 42 | 58 | |
| 78 | 4.2B CNY (≈$590M) | 41 | 45 | |
| 79 | 3.6B CNY (≈$499M) | 41 | 17 | |
| 80 | 2.8B CNY (≈$389M) | 39 | 27 | |
| 81 | 2.5B CNY (≈$353M) | 39 | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score