Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FrontView REIT, Inc.
How FrontView REIT, Inc. stacks up
FVR · against 227 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
20/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #177 of 228 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score22 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including FVR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 20?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.3% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.3% vs peer median 5.4%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.6% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FVR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FVR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 245 reported | 0.1% | 5.5% | 28% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 229 reported | 5.6% | 5.6% | 50% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 86 reported | 7.6% | 9.3% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 98.5% | 119.8% | 35% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FVR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 2 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 174 | 10.7B TWD (≈$332M) | 21 | 21 | |
| 174 | 58.3B JPY (≈$396M) | 21 | 34 | |
| 174 | 882M CHF (≈$1.0B) | 21 | 47 | |
| 177 | 69.1B JPY (≈$470M) | 20 | 37 | |
| 177 | 568M USD | 20 | 38 | |
| 177 | 1.1B SGD (≈$813M) | 20 | 59 | |
| 180 | 3.5B CNY (≈$492M) | 19 | 70 | |
| 181 | 743M SGD (≈$565M) | 18 | 41 | |
| 182 | 3.0B CNY (≈$427M) | 17 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score