Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FrontView REIT, Inc.
How FrontView REIT, Inc. stacks up
FVR · against 175 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
20/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #151 of 176 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score18 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including FVR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 20?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.3% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.3% vs peer median 5.4%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.6% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FVR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FVR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 0.1% | 2.9% | 25% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 158 reported | 5.6% | 6.1% | 43% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 167 reported | 7.6% | 5.9% | 64% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 98.5% | 63.5% | 70% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FVR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | Unavailable | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 86M USD | 98 | 78 | |
| 4 | 255M USD | 96 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 146 | 905M USD | 22 | 19 | |
| 146 | 7.3B USD | 22 | 23 | |
| 149 | 3.4B USD | 21 | 17 | |
| 149 | 5.2B USD | 21 | 44 | |
| 151 | 568M USD | 20 | 38 | |
| 152 | 68.1B USD | 19 | 33 | |
| 152 | 48.0B USD | 19 | 44 | |
| 154 | 3.3B USD | 17 | 55 | |
| 154 | 2.4B USD | 17 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score