Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.
How Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. stacks up
FULC · against 344 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
21/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #251 of 345 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score45 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including FULC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 21?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 84% of peers. Return on assets: -26.2% vs peer median 1.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 82% of peers. Return on invested capital: -28.9% vs peer median 4.7%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FULC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FULC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 308 reported | -28.9% | -0.2% | 23% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 321 reported | Not reported | 2.5% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 345 reported | -26.2% | -0.4% | 21% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 324 reported | -32.4% | -0.8% | 25% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 361 reported | 0.0% | 36.9% | 5% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FULC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 5.5B NOK (≈$523M) | 98 | 71 | |
| 2 | 261M USD | 98 | 97 | |
| 4 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 97 | 61 | |
| 4 | 356M AUD (≈$235M) | 97 | 81 | |
| 251 | 560M USD | 21 | 42 | |
| 251 | 365M USD | 21 | 41 | |
| 251 | 486M USD | 21 | 16 | |
| 251 | 375M USD | 21 | 46 | |
| 251 | 285M USD | 21 | 38 | |
| 257 | 222M USD | 20 | 31 | |
| 257 | 238M USD | 20 | 41 | |
| 257 | 299M USD | 20 | 38 | |
| 260 | 5.7B TWD (≈$177M) | 19 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score