Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to H.B. Fuller Company
How H.B. Fuller Company stacks up
FUL · against 337 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #144 of 338 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score40 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including FUL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.5% vs peer median 3.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -0.1% vs peer median -0.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 81% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 73.0% vs peer median 9.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FUL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FUL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 340 reported | 1.5% | 5.9% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 73.0% | 14.6% | 79% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 334 reported | -0.1% | 1.7% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FUL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.29T ARS (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 2 | 11.8B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 2 | 4.2B CAD (≈$3.0B) | 99 | 74 | |
| 4 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 4 | 7.5B AUD (≈$5.0B) | 98 | 79 | |
| 144 | 9.9B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 64 | 32 | |
| 144 | 334.8B JPY (≈$2.3B) | 64 | 68 | |
| 144 | 18.3B CNY (≈$2.6B) | 64 | 69 | |
| 144 | 3.14T CLP (≈$3.5B) | 64 | 62 | |
| 144 | 2.7B USD | 64 | 51 | |
| 144 | 3.0B USD | 64 | 68 | |
| 150 | 28.9B CNY (≈$4.1B) | 63 | 43 | |
| 150 | 3.0B SGD (≈$2.2B) | 63 | 43 | |
| 150 | 3.3B USD | 63 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score