Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fortive Corporation
How Fortive Corporation stacks up
FTV · against 157 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
56/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #81 of 158 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score22 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including FTV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.4% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.6% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FTV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FTV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 157 reported | 2.8% | 3.2% | 42% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 155 reported | 5.3% | 5.3% | 49% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 103 reported | 5.2% | 3.3% | 71% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 150 reported | 30.0% | 17.9% | 74% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FTV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 2 | 20.1B USD | 94 | 68 | |
| 4 | 17.5B USD | 93 | 93 | |
| 4 | 10.6B USD | 93 | 68 | |
| 76 | 10.4B GBP (≈$13.6B) | 58 | 52 | |
| 76 | 12.9B USD | 58 | 47 | |
| 80 | 387.7B TWD (≈$12.0B) | 57 | 54 | |
| 81 | 32.5B USD | 56 | 43 | |
| 81 | 20.2B USD | 56 | 50 | |
| 81 | 28.3B USD | 56 | 42 | |
| 81 | 30.8B USD | 56 | 59 | |
| 85 | 92.1B CNY (≈$12.9B) | 55 | 51 | |
| 85 | 932.5B TWD (≈$28.9B) | 55 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score