Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Flotek Industries, Inc.
How Flotek Industries, Inc. stacks up
FTK · against 99 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
94/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #6 of 100 · scores higher than 95% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including FTK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 94?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 87% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 15.0% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 89% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 122.0% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 92% of peers. Revenue growth: 36.8% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FTK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FTK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 101 reported | 36.8% | -2.7% | 93% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 66 reported | 122.0% | -7.5% | 95% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 99 reported | 15.0% | -2.3% | 92% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FTK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 4.6B CNY (≈$641M) | 97 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 98 | |
| 4 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 95 | 38 | |
| 4 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 57 | |
| 6 | 900M USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 7 | 17.6B NOK (≈$1.7B) | 93 | 75 | |
| 8 | 942M USD | 92 | 69 | |
| 9 | 10.9B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 89 | 36 | |
| 10 | 1.0B USD | 88 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score