Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FTAI Aviation Ltd.
How FTAI Aviation Ltd. stacks up
FTAI · against 194 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #9 of 195 · scores higher than 95% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score19 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including FTAI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 8.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 96% of peers. Revenue growth: 45.3% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 98% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 42.7% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FTAI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FTAI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 196 reported | 45.3% | 7.3% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 176 reported | 8.5% | 11.2% | 45% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 194 reported | 42.7% | 6.6% | 98% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FTAI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 12.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 85.2B CNY (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 75 | |
| 3 | 16.48T KRW (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 5 | 18.35T KRW (≈$13.2B) | 97 | 56 | |
| 5 | 1.39T INR (≈$16.7B) | 97 | 54 | |
| 7 | 11.0B USD | 96 | 65 | |
| 7 | 22.7B USD | 96 | 41 | |
| 9 | 20.6B USD | 95 | 61 | |
| 9 | 34.8B USD | 95 | 49 | |
| 11 | 20.9B USD | 93 | 61 | |
| 11 | 1.18T INR (≈$14.2B) | 93 | 72 | |
| 11 | 354.4B SEK (≈$35.4B) | 93 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score