Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FirstService Corporation
How FirstService Corporation stacks up
FSV · against 124 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
50/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #60 of 125 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score26 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including FSV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield and free cash flow yield than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 5.3%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.6% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 67% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.7% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FSV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FSV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 128 reported | 2.2% | 4.7% | 22% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 124 reported | 6.4% | 5.6% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 66 reported | 4.8% | 5.1% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 131 reported | 15.0% | 87.7% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FSV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 2 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 3 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 4 | 880.1B JPY (≈$6.0B) | 84 | 64 | |
| 4 | 135.9B MXN (≈$7.3B) | 84 | 76 | |
| 57 | 19.0B SAR (≈$5.1B) | 51 | 61 | |
| 57 | 28.2B CNY (≈$3.9B) | 51 | 31 | |
| 57 | 9.1B USD | 51 | 38 | |
| 60 | 6.3B EUR (≈$6.9B) | 50 | 52 | |
| 60 | 6.2B USD | 50 | 63 | |
| 60 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 50 | 78 | |
| 60 | 9.4B USD | 50 | 51 | |
| 64 | 57.1B SEK (≈$5.7B) | 49 | 50 | |
| 64 | 3.58T CLP (≈$3.9B) | 49 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score