Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FirstService Corporation
How FirstService Corporation stacks up
FSV · against 131 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Profitability
88/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #15 of 132 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score20 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including FSV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 88?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 78% of peers. Operating margin: 6.1% vs peer median 26.8%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 86% of peers. Return on assets: 4.5% vs peer median 2.1%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 91% of peers. Return on invested capital: 11.6% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FSV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FSV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 131 reported | 11.6% | 4.1% | 95% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 127 reported | 6.1% | 40.7% | 10% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 127 reported | 4.5% | 2.6% | 84% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 128 reported | 12.1% | 6.6% | 84% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 132 reported | 33.1% | 64.5% | 15% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FSV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 2 | 91.4B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 3 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 97 | 82 | |
| 3 | 3.5B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 5 | 3.8B USD | 95 | 74 | |
| 11 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 90 | 86 | |
| 11 | 4.3B USD | 90 | 94 | |
| 13 | 8.7B USD | 89 | 77 | |
| 13 | 3.58T CLP (≈$3.9B) | 89 | 66 | |
| 15 | 6.2B USD | 88 | 63 | |
| 15 | 83.6B SEK (≈$8.4B) | 88 | 47 | |
| 15 | 3.3B USD | 88 | 78 | |
| 18 | 12.1B USD | 87 | 43 | |
| 18 | 5.7B USD | 87 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score