Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Federal Signal Corporation
How Federal Signal Corporation stacks up
FSS · against 399 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #233 of 400 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score63 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including FSS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.0% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FSS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FSS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 389 reported | 4.0% | 4.2% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 403 reported | 6.6% | 7.6% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 182 reported | 4.7% | 4.0% | 58% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 385 reported | 21.1% | 36.9% | 24% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FSS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 6.28T KRW (≈$4.5B) | 98 | 53 | |
| 3 | 28.3B HKD (≈$3.6B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 3 | 37.8B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 86 | |
| 233 | 4.4B USD | 48 | 64 | |
| 233 | 319.2B INR (≈$3.8B) | 48 | 61 | |
| 233 | 5.8B USD | 48 | 72 | |
| 233 | 4.0B USD | 48 | 45 | |
| 233 | 7.2B USD | 48 | 70 | |
| 233 | 12.8B CAD (≈$9.4B) | 48 | 47 | |
| 233 | 14.2B USD | 48 | 64 | |
| 233 | 11.9B USD | 48 | 51 | |
| 233 | 4.9B CAD (≈$3.6B) | 48 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score