Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fortuna Mining Corp.
How Fortuna Mining Corp. stacks up
FSM · against 346 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
99/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #2 of 347 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score37 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including FSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 99?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 93% of peers. Earnings yield: 10.3% vs peer median 3.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 96% of peers. EBITDA yield: 32.8% vs peer median 8.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 96% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 23.4% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FSM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 341 reported | 13.2% | 4.7% | 94% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 32.8% | 9.6% | 98% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 91 reported | 23.4% | 3.9% | 98% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 333 reported | 67.5% | 55.9% | 59% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FSM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 2.73T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 4 | 69.8B ZAR (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 4 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 4 | 3.7B AUD (≈$2.4B) | 98 | 84 | |
| 7 | 11.4B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 97 | 85 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score