Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fortuna Mining Corp.
How Fortuna Mining Corp. stacks up
FSM · against 348 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Profitability
96/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #19 of 349 · scores higher than 93% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score47 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including FSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 96?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 91% of peers. Return on invested capital: 28.7% vs peer median 6.7%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 92% of peers. Return on assets: 12.2% vs peer median 2.5%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 96% of peers. Operating margin: 43.1% vs peer median 7.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FSM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 332 reported | 28.7% | 8.6% | 88% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 344 reported | 43.1% | 9.2% | 96% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 323 reported | 12.2% | 3.5% | 89% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 320 reported | 24.1% | 8.2% | 87% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 352 reported | 57.2% | 25.1% | 90% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FSM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 387.1B INR (≈$4.6B) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 29.0B CNY (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 2 | 73.0B MXN (≈$3.9B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2.0B USD | 98 | 89 | |
| 2 | 2.0B AUD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 19 | 11.9B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 96 | 79 | |
| 19 | 11.8B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 96 | 77 | |
| 19 | 30.7B CNY (≈$4.3B) | 96 | 71 | |
| 19 | 3.3B USD | 96 | 66 | |
| 19 | 2.6B USD | 96 | 81 | |
| 19 | 69.8B ZAR (≈$3.8B) | 96 | 76 | |
| 25 | 3.3B USD | 95 | 76 | |
| 25 | 2.20T CLP (≈$2.4B) | 95 | 74 | |
| 27 | 11.4B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 94 | 85 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score