Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FS KKR Capital Corp.
How FS KKR Capital Corp. stacks up
FSK · against 88 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #87 of 89 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score4 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including FSK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 10.0%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 99% of peers. Revenue growth: -83.0% vs peer median 7.4%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 77% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.3% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FSK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FSK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 96 reported | -83.0% | 11.1% | 0% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 74 reported | -98.1% | 12.7% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 83 reported | 0.3% | 12.6% | 15% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FSK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 45.3B HKD (≈$5.8B) | 95 | 40 | |
| 4 | 3.0B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 230.3B INR (≈$2.8B) | 92 | ||
| 83 | 1.9B USD | 14 | 47 | |
| 84 | 3.8B GBP (≈$4.9B) | 13 | 55 | |
| 85 | 3.37T KRW (≈$2.4B) | 11 | 26 | |
| 86 | 3.2B EUR (≈$3.5B) | 9 | 10 | |
| 87 | 3.1B USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 88 | 3.1B AUD (≈$2.1B) | 2 | 62 | |
| 89 | 33.8B HKD (≈$4.3B) | 0 | 10 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score