Ranked #90 of 169 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
18 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including FSBW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
▼a lower return on shareholders' equity: weaker than 65% of peers. Return on equity: 10.4% vs peer median 10.7%
●Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 1.0% vs peer median 1.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FSBW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
FSBW
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 154 reported
3.6%
8.0%
27%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 38 reported
Not reported
9.7%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 171 reported
1.0%
1.1%
46%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 167 reported
9.2%
10.4%
45%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 179 reported
0.0%
0.0%
1%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
