Ranked #164 of 181 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
16 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including FRST · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 13?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
▲a lower price relative to book value (P/B): stronger than 77% of peers. Book yield: 116.6% vs peer median 79.5%
▲Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -2.2% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FRST, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
FRST
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 180 reported
15.0%
8.8%
83%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 39 reported
Not reported
11.3%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 110 reported
-12.2%
7.3%
13%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 181 reported
118.9%
91.5%
66%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
