Ranked #164 of 177 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
28 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including FRST · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its return on assets, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 95% of peers. Return on assets: -0.2% vs peer median 1.2%
▲a higher return on shareholders' equity: stronger than 65% of peers. Return on equity: -1.9% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FRST, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
FRST
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 161 reported
6.6%
8.8%
42%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 37 reported
Not reported
9.3%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 179 reported
-0.2%
1.1%
9%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 175 reported
13.4%
10.4%
71%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 187 reported
0.0%
0.0%
1%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
