Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FRP Holdings, Inc.
How FRP Holdings, Inc. stacks up
FRPH · against 185 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
15/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #148 of 186 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including FRPH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 81% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.6% vs peer median 5.4%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.0% vs peer median 5.3%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -11.6% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FRPH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FRPH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 201 reported | 0.0% | 5.6% | 28% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 186 reported | 1.8% | 5.3% | 22% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 70 reported | 8.0% | 8.5% | 46% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 204 reported | 121.2% | 130.7% | 44% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FRPH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 142 | 743M SGD (≈$565M) | 18 | 41 | |
| 142 | 2.9B NOK (≈$280M) | 18 | 26 | |
| 146 | 3.0B CNY (≈$427M) | 17 | 61 | |
| 146 | 332M USD | 17 | 45 | |
| 148 | 354M USD | 15 | 41 | |
| 148 | 343M SGD (≈$261M) | 15 | 32 | |
| 150 | 526M AUD (≈$347M) | 14 | 41 | |
| 151 | 1.5B HKD (≈$194M) | 13 | 50 | |
| 151 | 1.4B MYR (≈$299M) | 13 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score