Ranked #5 of 205 · scores higher than 98% of peers · safety percentile 97
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
34 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including FRPH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Lower relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 97 among Real Estate companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, debt / equity and beta, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
▲a share price that has swung less with the market: stronger than 62% of peers. Beta: 0.52 vs peer median 0.75
▲less borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: stronger than 73% of peers. Debt / equity: 0.50× vs peer median 0.80×
▲more short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: stronger than 95% of peers. Current ratio: 5.86× vs peer median 1.20×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FRPH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
