Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FRP Holdings, Inc.
How FRP Holdings, Inc. stacks up
FRPH · against 207 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Profitability
20/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #161 of 208 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score25 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including FRPH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 20?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 82% of peers. Return on assets: -0.0% vs peer median 2.1%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 80% of peers. Return on invested capital: 0.7% vs peer median 3.4%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 69% of peers. Operating margin: 11.6% vs peer median 26.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FRPH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FRPH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 204 reported | 0.7% | 2.9% | 21% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 199 reported | 11.6% | 21.0% | 35% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 201 reported | -0.0% | 1.9% | 17% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 199 reported | -0.1% | 4.5% | 28% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 209 reported | 63.4% | 49.0% | 65% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FRPH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 310M USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 678M AUD (≈$447M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 3 | 59.8B JPY (≈$406M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 973M MYR (≈$214M) | 98 | 73 | |
| 3 | 3.3B HKD (≈$418M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 158 | 343M SGD (≈$261M) | 21 | 32 | |
| 161 | 3.1B CNY (≈$433M) | 20 | 10 | |
| 161 | 355M USD | 20 | 37 | |
| 161 | 633M USD | 20 | 33 | |
| 161 | 354M USD | 20 | 41 | |
| 165 | 1.5B HKD (≈$194M) | 19 | 50 | |
| 165 | 12.0B TWD (≈$372M) | 19 | 47 | |
| 165 | 230M EUR (≈$253M) | 19 | 24 | |
| 165 | 14.3B THB (≈$401M) | 19 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score