Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FRNM · against 457 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #433 of 458 · scores higher than 5% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)39 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including FRNM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FRNM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 432 reported | Not reported | 0.20× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 432 reported | 0.60 | 0.49 | 44% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 444 reported | 1.05× | 2.93× | 9% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 99 | ||
| 429 | 1.5B USD | 7 | 32 | |
| 430 | 42.9B TWD (≈$1.3B) | 7 | 57 | |
| 431 | 1.2B USD | 7 | 36 | |
| 432 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 7 | 17 | |
| 433 | 1.2B USD | 6 | 3 | |
| 434 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 6 | 52 | |
| 435 | 773M USD | 6 | 64 | |
| 436 | 13.9B SEK (≈$1.4B) | 6 | 48 | |
| 437 | 14.2B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 6 | 10 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score