Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fermi Inc.
How Fermi Inc. stacks up
FRMI · against 175 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
12/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #166 of 176 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score20 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including FRMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 12?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -95.3% vs peer median 6.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -53.3% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FRMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FRMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | -71.7% | 2.9% | 2% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 158 reported | Not reported | 6.1% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 167 reported | -95.1% | 5.9% | 1% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 79.5% | 63.5% | 59% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FRMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | Unavailable | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 86M USD | 98 | 78 | |
| 4 | 255M USD | 96 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 164 | 9.2B USD | 14 | ||
| 164 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score