Ranked #176 of 180 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
23 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including FRHC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 2?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its book yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 98% of peers. Book yield: 12.9% vs peer median 79.5%
▼lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 94% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.2% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FRHC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
FRHC
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 181 reported
1.3%
8.0%
3%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 53 reported
Not reported
8.9%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 96 reported
-7.7%
9.2%
11%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 176 reported
13.4%
75.6%
3%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
