Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Farmland Partners Inc.
How Farmland Partners Inc. stacks up
FPI · against 194 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #119 of 195 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score13 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including FPI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.5% vs peer median 5.4%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.8% vs peer median 6.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 6.7% vs peer median 5.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FPI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FPI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 212 reported | 5.6% | 5.7% | 49% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 195 reported | 4.5% | 5.4% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 76 reported | 4.8% | 9.5% | 31% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 215 reported | 121.4% | 129.8% | 47% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FPI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 115 | 59.8B JPY (≈$406M) | 46 | 80 | |
| 116 | 439M USD | 45 | 43 | |
| 117 | 3.5B SEK (≈$349M) | 43 | 49 | |
| 118 | 2.5B MYR (≈$545M) | 42 | 47 | |
| 119 | 384M USD | 38 | 43 | |
| 120 | 306M EUR (≈$336M) | 37 | 53 | |
| 121 | 3.7B HKD (≈$477M) | 36 | 52 | |
| 121 | 67.8B JPY (≈$461M) | 36 | 52 | |
| 121 | 345M AUD (≈$228M) | 36 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score