Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Five Point Holdings, LLC
How Five Point Holdings, LLC stacks up
FPH · against 239 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
25/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #172 of 240 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score25 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including FPH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 25?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 86% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.1% vs peer median 5.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.8% vs peer median 6.5%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 89% of peers. Earnings yield: 15.3% vs peer median 5.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FPH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FPH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 258 reported | 15.3% | 5.5% | 90% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 238 reported | 0.1% | 5.6% | 13% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 89 reported | 9.8% | 8.9% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 259 reported | 262.2% | 119.8% | 88% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FPH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 2 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 169 | 309M EUR (≈$340M) | 26 | 54 | |
| 169 | 1.2B USD | 26 | 21 | |
| 169 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 26 | 45 | |
| 172 | 74.2B JPY (≈$504M) | 25 | 53 | |
| 172 | 667M USD | 25 | 59 | |
| 172 | 903M SGD (≈$686M) | 25 | 40 | |
| 175 | 676M SGD (≈$514M) | 24 | 43 | |
| 175 | 603M CHF (≈$694M) | 24 | 42 | |
| 177 | 1.8B NZD (≈$1.1B) | 23 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score