Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Five Point Holdings, LLC
How Five Point Holdings, LLC stacks up
FPH · against 265 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Profitability
88/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #32 of 266 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score25 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including FPH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 88?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 70% of peers. Return on invested capital: 4.9% vs peer median 3.4%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 91% of peers. Return on assets: 5.1% vs peer median 2.1%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 100% of peers. Operating margin: 128.0% vs peer median 26.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FPH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FPH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 260 reported | 4.9% | 3.2% | 73% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 255 reported | 128.0% | 25.3% | 100% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 260 reported | 5.1% | 2.1% | 91% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 257 reported | 6.0% | 5.0% | 57% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 267 reported | 45.4% | 53.7% | 42% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FPH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.42T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 2 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 91 | |
| 2 | 678M AUD (≈$447M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 4 | 59.8B JPY (≈$406M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 3.3B HKD (≈$418M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 28 | 1.2B USD | 89 | 69 | |
| 28 | 1.1B SGD (≈$864M) | 89 | 76 | |
| 28 | 768M SGD (≈$583M) | 89 | 65 | |
| 28 | 335M EUR (≈$368M) | 89 | ||
| 32 | 667M USD | 88 | 59 | |
| 33 | 30.4B TWD (≈$941M) | 87 | 82 | |
| 33 | 6.4B CNY (≈$894M) | 87 | 58 | |
| 35 | 5.8B HKD (≈$737M) | 86 | 86 | |
| 35 | 1.2B AUD (≈$811M) | 86 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score