Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fossil Group, Inc.
How Fossil Group, Inc. stacks up
FOSL · against 547 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
11/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #453 of 548 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score73 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including FOSL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 11?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -17.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -10.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 73% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.1% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FOSL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FOSL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 536 reported | -19.0% | 3.1% | 6% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 559 reported | 5.0% | 8.3% | 33% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 149 reported | -10.4% | 7.2% | 7% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 539 reported | 23.7% | 66.5% | 13% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FOSLScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score