Ranked #1 of 52 · scores higher than 100% of peers · safety percentile 98
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
4 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including FNV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Lower relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 98 among Basic Materials companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
▼a share price that has swung more with the market: weaker than 71% of peers. Beta: 0.93 vs peer median 0.69
●Debt / equity is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
▲more short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: stronger than 96% of peers. Current ratio: 8.30× vs peer median 1.76×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FNV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
FNV
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 51 reported
Not reported
0.47×
—
—
33%
BetaLower is better · 50 reported
0.93
0.88
41%
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 46 reported
9.38×
1.77×
100%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
