Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Franco-Nevada Corporation
How Franco-Nevada Corporation stacks up
FNV · against 51 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
93/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #8 of 52 · scores higher than 84% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including FNV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 82% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.5% vs peer median -0.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 84% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 101.2% vs peer median 9.4%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 95% of peers. Revenue growth: 63.7% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FNV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FNV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 52 reported | 63.7% | 7.8% | 92% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 43 reported | 101.2% | 57.9% | 62% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 52 reported | 11.5% | 2.2% | 71% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FNV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 47.9B EUR (≈$52.7B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 53.3B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 486.3B MXN (≈$26.3B) | 98 | 91 | |
| 4 | 30.8B USD | 98 | 83 | |
| 6 | 84.6B USD | 95 | 82 | |
| 6 | 23.6B USD | 95 | 81 | |
| 8 | 43.6B USD | 93 | 81 | |
| 8 | 3.22T INR (≈$38.7B) | 93 | 63 | |
| 10 | 164.5B CNY (≈$23.0B) | 92 | 72 | |
| 11 | 85.5B CAD (≈$62.4B) | 91 | 85 | |
| 12 | 30.3B USD | 87 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score