Ranked #120 of 195 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
16 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including FNF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its earnings yield and book yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.0% vs peer median 7.9%
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 63% of peers. Book yield: 67.1% vs peer median 79.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FNF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
FNF
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 196 reported
7.0%
8.0%
35%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 57 reported
18.2%
8.9%
89%
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 101 reported
48.9%
9.7%
94%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 191 reported
67.2%
75.4%
40%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
